Illustrative case study
48 V industrial lithium battery module.
This case is entirely fictional and is shown only to demonstrate the type of DPP preparation output a real engagement could produce.
Fictional example
71%
22 of 31 reviewed requirements complete
Verify / update5
Missing4
Supplier dependencies7
Starting point
The fictional manufacturer has an ERP export, a BOM, a Declaration of Conformity, a technical datasheet, several supplier declarations and a set of performance test reports. The information exists, but it is not organised around the passport requirements.
| Example data point | Initial source | Status | Preparation action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer identity | DoC / QMS master data | Complete | Link current revision in source register |
| Unique product identifier | ERP | Complete | Confirm DPP identifier mapping |
| Recycled content | Supplier declaration | Verify | Obtain current evidence and applicability |
| Carbon-footprint evidence | None identified | Missing | Confirm current applicability/format and assign owner |
| Document revision control | Mixed folders | Missing | Create source register and revision/date discipline |
What the preparation pack changes
31requirements reviewed
22complete
5verify/update
4missing
Before
- Evidence spread across unrelated files.
- Supplier dependencies mixed into email threads.
- No single owner for several fields.
- Unclear implementation handover.
After
- Requirement matrix linked to source IDs.
- Seven supplier dependencies tracked separately.
- Missing/verify items assigned to owners.
- Structured output ready for DPP implementation decisions.
Want to do this with one real product?
The pilot is intentionally small: enough to reveal the actual data and supplier work before committing to a full catalogue rollout.